Use cases · EU AI Act & regulated operations

Regulated work needs records someone else can check.

Regulation can ask operators of AI systems to keep records, to show human oversight, and to answer questions after the fact. Under the EU AI Act, record-keeping and oversight apply only if the system is classified high-risk, from 2 Dec 2027 for Annex III systems (Action State EU AI Act obligations mapping, 3 Sep 2026; Reg (EU) 2026/1744). Records that only the operator can read don't carry much weight with anyone else.

What gets recorded

  • Each agent action and each human approval, sealed at the moment it happens.
  • What was withheld from a record, marked as withheld, so it doesn't look like it's missing.

What anyone can check

  • Records verify offline against public keys, so a reviewer doesn't have to trust the operator's tooling or ours.

What runs today

What's built, and what isn't yet.

  • Runs today Sealing, approval records and offline verification.
  • Runs today The EU AI Act obligations that can apply to AI agents, grouped by the date each applies and the condition, if any: EU AI Act page ↗.

Records are evidence for a reviewer. They are not a legal opinion.

EU AI Act: the obligations by date ↗ · The Evidence Report